版权说明 操作指南
首页 > 成果 > 详情

Written Arguments About Vaccination: Experimental Studies in the United States and China

认领
导出
Link by DOI
反馈
分享
QQ微信 微博
成果类型:
期刊论文
作者:
Wolfe, Christopher R.;Gao, Hongli;Wu, Junjie;Wang, Yizhu;Marroquin, Josselyn E.;...
通讯作者:
Wolfe, CR
作者机构:
[Wolfe, Christopher R.; Brace, Wylie; Marroquin, Josselyn E.] Miami Univ, Dept Psychol, Oxford, OH 45056 USA.
[Wang, Yizhu; Gao, Hongli] Xinxiang Med Univ, Sch Psychol, Xinxiang, Peoples R China.
[Wu, Junjie] Cent China Normal Univ, Sch Psychol, Wuhan, Peoples R China.
通讯机构:
[Wolfe, CR ] M
Miami Univ, Dept Psychol, Oxford, OH 45056 USA.
语种:
英文
关键词:
argumentation;argumentation schema;anti-vax;public health discourse;argumentation east and west;argument strength;medical decisions
期刊:
Written Communication
ISSN:
0741-0883
年:
2023
卷:
40
期:
4
页码:
1218-1252
机构署名:
本校为其他机构
院系归属:
心理学院
摘要:
Written Communication, Volume 40, Issue 4, Page 1218-1252, October 2023. Guided by argumentation schema theory, we conducted five psychological studies in the United States and China on arguments about vaccination. Study 1 replicated research about arguments on several topics, finding that agreement judgments are weighted toward claims, whereas quality judgments are weighted toward reasons. However, consistent with recent research, when this paradigm was extended to arguments about vaccination (Study 2), claims received more weight than reasons in judgments about agreement and quality. Studies...

反馈

验证码:
看不清楚,换一个
确定
取消

成果认领

标题:
用户 作者 通讯作者
请选择
请选择
确定
取消

提示

该栏目需要登录且有访问权限才可以访问

如果您有访问权限,请直接 登录访问

如果您没有访问权限,请联系管理员申请开通

管理员联系邮箱:yun@hnwdkj.com