期刊论文

中文

东北大学学报(社会科学版)

1008-3758

2017

19

3

292-298,304

10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2017.03.011

(CLS(2016)C15):中国法学会部级法学研究一般课题资助项目 (CCNU16A06011):中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目

本校为第一机构

著作权法领域对于深度链接行为属性的认定倾向于采取"服务器标准"而非"用户感知标准",由此深度链接不是提供作品的信息网络传播行为.以此为刑法解释原点,则搜索引擎深度链接行为不能单独直接以侵犯著作权罪论处.从实然层面看,在《刑法修正案(九)》之前,深度链接入罪只能考虑共犯路径,但以片面帮助犯论处存在诸多障碍;之后刑法虽新设了罪名但亦不能完全突破共犯模式下的追责障碍.从应然层面看,当前刑法应谨慎介入搜索引擎深度链接行为的规制,共犯正犯化的立法模式过于急躁冒进,将彻底抛弃技术中立的立场,打破著作权人与公众利益的平衡状态并违背刑法的谦抑性原则.

The "server standard" rather than "user perception standard" was adopted to identify the nature of deep link behavior in terms of copyright laws.As a result, deep link is not regarded as an act of Internet-based information transmission.Starting from this view, deep link behavior of search engines cannot be directly punished for infringing upon copyrights.In fact, the accomplice theory was taken into account to criminalize it before the Amendment Ⅸ to the Criminal Law was enforced, but there are many obstacles when it is identified as a unilat...