Chalmers claimed that his epistemic two-dimensional semantics admitted Kripke＇s theories of modality and meaning, and argued for this from modal argument and epistemic argument respectively. However, what the epistemic two-dimensional semantics invokes to is modal rationalism monism, which violates the distinction between epistemic modality and metaphysical modality made by Kripke; and, if epistemic intension can integrate the causal mechanism of reference, then it will be metasemantical component. Therefore, it is not that epistemic two-dimensional semantics admits ...
