期刊论文

中文

社会学研究

1002-5936

2009

5

141-164

10.19934/j.cnki.shxyj.2009.05.006

本文系国家社科基金青年项目“市场秩序中的‘惯例’问题研究”的阶段性成果（批准号：09CSH027）.感谢郑杭生老师、江立华老师对我的指导.陆汉文教授、闻翔、王楠、林顺利等曾阅读本文初稿并提出宝贵意见,本文的完善也受益于《社会学研究》编辑部的审稿意见,谨此一并致谢.

本校为第一机构

本文辨析了波兰尼和格兰诺维特的嵌入性思想,指出他们在市场与社会关系问题上代表两种不同的学术取向:社会构件论的市场观与社会建构论的市场观。前者系市场的实体嵌入,未给隔离于社会的自主性市场留下任何可能性;后者系市场的形式嵌入,在一定程度上给市场保留了社会因素无法进入、依自身逻辑运作的硬核。批评者眼中波兰尼的"市场悖论"建基于市场的形式嵌入,而在波兰尼那里实无真正意义上的"脱嵌的市场"存在,这一悖论不过是由其分析技艺所造成的假象。格兰诺维特取向的经济社会学研究带回了经济学所缺失的"背景"分析,虽然更具分析力和解释力,但其针对经济学所试图做出的替代性解释却不够彻底。而...

Polanyi and Granovetter's idea of embeddedness represents two academic orientations on the relationship of market and society,while one is taking market as a social component,the other is taking market as social constructed. The former refers to the substantive embeddedness of markets,which leaves no possibility for the autonomous market isolated from society,while the latter refers to the formal embeddedness of markets,which keeps a core where social factors are absent. Criticism on Polanyi's paradox is mostly based on formal embeddedness of markets,while there is everlasting embeddedness and...